| Commission 9 Seminar on Compulsory purchase and compensation 
	in land acquisition and takingsHelsinki, Finland, 6-8 September 2007
					
						| 
						
						 Commission 9 seminar at the Helsinki Technical
 University.
 |  Dr. 
						Paul Munro-Faure, FAO at a workshop during
 Commission 9 seminar in Helsinki.
 |  This seminar has been organised by FIG Commission 9 - Valuation and 
	Management of Real Estate, in conjunction to the Baltic Valuation Conference 
	and with the FIG Commissions 7 - Cadastre and Land Management, and 8 - 
	Spatial Planning and Development.  The major goal of the meeting was to intensify the discussion between 
	valuers, surveyors, real estate experts, financiers, urban planners, 
	researchers, teachers and decision makers and develop common ideas for 
	shaping the future. The seminar was very active with about 120 participants 
	from 35 countries. ObjectivesCompulsory purchase (expropriation) is an important tool in most of 
	countries for land acquisition for public purposes although in many 
	countries land acquisition can often be arranged trough other means, e.g. by 
	voluntary agreements. In recent years the discussion of the use of 
	compulsory purchase has been rather limited. It is not known what kind of 
	new legislation, practises and methods for valuation of compensations has 
	been adopted and how well they function. Also the old methods and procedures 
	might have been ineffective or unpopular. To find out the present situation 
	and potential for new good practices the seminar concentrated to the 
	following objectives: 
					to identify the legal structures and practices in compulsory 
		purchase and compensation in different countries,to study if the compensation statutes, valuation methods and manners 
		will lead to full and just compensation and identify possible 
		shortcomings, andto find possible and effective solutions to solve the problems 
		especially for developing countries. What are the best practices and 
		what principles should be taken into consideration or should be avoided. The seminarFIG President Prof Stig Enemark and the Finnish Minister of 
	Housing Jan Vapaavuori gave welcome addresses. Prof Rachelle 
	Alterman gave the keynote presentation about the legitimate purposes to 
	expropriation. During the seminar the focus was on expropriation systems and 
	the need for alternatives, compensation, quality management of expropriation 
	processes, the protection of property rights, uncertainty of valuation, pro 
	poor approaches to compensation and expropriation in developing countries, 
	human rights perspective, history and development of expropriation. A lot of 
	attention has been given to the Background and Context for the FAO/World 
	Bank Initiative on Compulsory Purchase and Compensation. Finally there was 
	attention to some special themes and cases from specific regions, such as: 
	can I bore a tunnel under your house? Or: does land expropriation support 
	innovative procurement in road projects?  The presentations can be found from the seminar website. WorkshopMany opinions were presented during the workshop. Concerning the 
	procedure of expropriation it can be observed that, from the perspective of 
	the acquiring authorities there is a need for a speedy timeframe, low costs 
	process for compensation, avoidance of external costs of expropriation, and: 
	there should be sufficient resources for expropriation.  On the other side, from the perspective of affected occupants, users, 
	owners there is a need for: transparency and information, avoidance of 
	expropriation (generally - it has to be absolutely necessary), a proper 
	planning and negotiation process and a fair compensation. Those issues are also relevant for foreign investors. Further the 
	interests of women/men, landlords/tenants, formal/informal and indigenous 
	and customary have to be recognised; resettlement can be an option in 
	certain situations, if possible to be combined with rights to return. 
	Technical expertise is required an decent salaries are important to avoid 
	undesirable situations when professionals are concerned. All this can be supported by: provision of technical expertise, 
	development of guidelines on particular issues, expropriation-related land 
	tools: e.g. better planning processes, compensation, enumeration, conflict 
	resolution. And, more specific, by providing resources for acquisition, 
	availability of sufficient professionals, advocacy support, legal support 
	and international (& national) complaint mechanisms. Training remains a key 
	issue.  When assessments and compensations come into the process there is a need 
	for uniformity based on (international) standards. Transparency, equity and 
	free public access to property sales information are a basis for success. It 
	should be considered to increase the amount for compensation well above any 
	form of market value to achieve a quick acquisition process and to avoid 
	wasting time and money on lengthy negotiations, the state should even have a 
	limited time to agree on compensation - if the state cannot agree 
	compensation in that time frame the state should loose the right to acquire 
	the land.  When standardisation comes in it is most relevant to provide a single 
	definition for the term of value - which countries can amend for their 
	purposes as appropriate. Where the cooperation FIG/FAO is concerned ´best 
	practices´ should be analysed to understand the valuation and compensation 
	processes. It was suggested to establish an international committee of 
	experts to advise countries with specific problems. Guidelines should be on 
	the necessary skills and support organisations to develop skills and 
	capacity as well as relevant standards for compensation, assessment 
	definition and procedures. The need for an authorising or licensing system 
	for specialist valuers and other experts was discussed as well as the 
	creation of independent and liable professional bodies to inform all 
	parties. Mediation works well in practise, appeals could be skipped. Land 
	owners should have a choice between resettlement or financial compensation, 
	nominal values should be used.  ConclusionThe contents of the presentations and the opinions presented during the 
	workshop form a solid basis for future developments – in co-operation with 
	the FAO and the World Bank. Kauko ViitanenChair of FIG Commission 9 - Valuation and the Management of Real Estate
 
					
						| 
						
						 Mr. 
						Jarmo Ratia, Director General of the Finnish National 
			Land Survey making his welcome address at the reception.
 | 
						
						 Excursion to Helsinki.
 
 
 |  |