News in 2016

FIG Asia Pacific Capacity Development Network Report on

FIG / UN-GGIM-AP / JUPEM Geospatial and GNSS CORS Infrastructure and Systems Forum

16 - 17 October 2016 , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

   Download report

The Park Royal, Kuala Lumpur – Malaysia was the venue for the FIG, UN-GGIM-AP Working Group 1 Geodetic Reference Frame, and JUPEM forum on Geospatial and GNSS CORS Infrastructure and Systems.  The forum was convened on the 16 - 17 October 2016, and comprised of 6 sessions, and 22 presentations.   Although this style of workshop was not the first of its type in the Asia Pacific region, it was the first main gathering for the recently formed FIG Asia Pacific Capacity Development Network (AP CDN).

The impetus for this forum originated from discussions with several Asian countries, Leica Geosystems representatives (namely Mr Neil Ashcroft), UN-GGIM-AP Chair Dr. John Dawson and Rob Sarib at the FIG Working Week in Christchurch.  Over the next few months the program evolved and the following  objectives relevant to geospatial data and GNSS CORS infrastructure themes, such as standards, access to information, institutional arrangements, legal / policy requirements, technology, communications, data, capacity development, people and partnerships, were generated-  

The forum host Dr. Azhari bin Mohamed and the national government agency JUPEM (Department of Survey and Mapping, Malaysia) organised an outstanding venue, and provided additional staff to support the logistical components of the forum. All aspects of the venue, hospitality and service were professionally performed and enabled a friendly and participatory environment. 

Over 150 delegates from 21 different countries registered for the forum.  Over the 2 days, the forum attracted over 100 participants each day and these attendees actively engaged and contributed to the program.   To review and access all presentations listed in the following sessions, please navigate to FIG Asia Pacific Capacity Development Network website.


Group photo

Session - Status of Geospatial / Geodetic Infrastructure in the Region

Outline: Invited countries provided a brief overview of their status but more importantly shared insights into how their organisation overcame their biggest challenge when developing and establishing geodetic and geospatial infrastructure.
Presenters –

Session - Why Geospatial / Geodetic Infrastructure?

Outline - This session focused on the fundamental purpose and why countries need geospatial and geodetic infrastructure and information; with particular emphasis on how such infrastructure can confront a nation’s economic / political / social / technological challenges.

Presenters –

Session - Reference Frames and GNSS CORS

Outline - This session provided a technical overview on the hierarchal structure of reference frames and the potential benefits for participating agencies. This includes information on GGRF, ITRF, National geodetic datum, and the importance of GNSS CORS.

Presenters –

Session - Modernisation of Geospatial / Geodetic Infrastructure 

Outline – Case studies on the implementation of GNSS CORS to modernise geospatial and geodetic infrastructure were presented. This included information on challenges faced with respect to standards, access to information, institutional arrangements, legal / policy requirements, technology, communications, data, people and partnerships.

Presenters –

Session - The Role of Organisations and Sectors

Outline – In this session presenters provided an overview of their organisation and how they can support the geospatial and geodetic infrastructure in the region.
Presenters –

Workshop – Modernising Regional Geospatial / Geodetic Infrastructure

Outline – The purpose of this interactive session was for participants to identify, analyse and prioritise challenges for Region / Countries; explore solutions for the challenges; and discuss and strategize the way forward.

Facilitators – Dr. John Dawson UN-GGIM-AP WG -1 and Mr Robert Sarib FIG AP CDN

Presenter –

As previously mentioned, the forum was conducted in an atmosphere of respectfulness which resulted in open and honest discussions from participants.  Many common regional challenges were identified and possible strategies were considered.  A summary matrix of these workings was formed and is outlined below.

Issue / Challenge

Specific Problem

Strategy to Mitigate

Data Sharing

Data charging versus “open” / “free” data policy

Data infrastructure vs data service delivery

Sharing of data limited resulting in non-optimum outcomes

National legislation /regulation / policy hinders sharing

Preparation of an pro-forma data agreement to assist with setting up agreements

Establishing a forum for discussion, exchange of ideas

Encourage participation in common regional / sub regional cause or driver such as APREF

Focus the need on broader objectives / perspectives so as to articulate the importance of data sharing

Political “will” is an important factor and needs to be addressed and obtained

Examine the “parameters” / caveats surrounding data sharing and then discuss

Refer to international standards as a means e.g RINEX / SINEX

Technical capability

Lack of technical expertise is impeding geodetic infrastructure

Consider using or creating a data centre in the region

More workshops on implementation

Opportunities to be trained at agencies that have the experience (noting - funding is an issue)

Engage better with academic institutions

Develop a regional training framework based on “standards”, specifications, guidelines

Explore opportunities with private sector to provide training (noting funding is an issue)

Raising awareness of geospatial in primary / secondary educational curriculum

Develop a mechanism for short term attachments, internships on specific projects / disciplines (noting funding is an issue)

Use the network of professional surveyors

Use the national requirements for CPD to develop knowledge on geodesy / geospatial

Implementing change (modernisation)

Lack expertise in developing change programs impeding geodetic infrastructure (communicating change)

Legislate or mandate geodetic aspects

Ensure the technical issues are communicated / implemented before implementation occurs

Resourcing

Human + financial

Lack of expertise impeding implementation of geodetic infrastructure

Maintenance of infrastructure and systems

Ongoing justification of budgetary support

Scholarships specific to geodesy / geospatial from donor or development agencies / partners

Forums with prospective donor or development agencies /partners to understand their process

Advocate / promote the need / value for geodetic / geospatial infrastructure at national / regional / global levels and its importance to society and the economy

Legislation and policy

Absence of legislation and policies impede implementation of datums

Security of data clauses within legislation / regulations

Modernisation of legislation (digital info)

Examine the issues / challenges from a regional perspective

Prepare a proposal regarding legal requirements and compliance

Regional unifications

Lack of data sharing and standards impede unification

Duplication of infrastructure and data custodianship

Interoperability / integration of data and systems

More advocacy on standards, and guidelines; the benefits of application and adherence.

Business models

Roles / Responsibilities of government and private sector changing and is unclear thus leading to indecision and possible duplication and wastage of resources

Understand the options – share experiences.

More inclusion and discussion amongst the various sectors

Communication infrastructure

Unreliable or lack of communication Impeding geospatial / geodetic infrastructure opportunities

Regulations re frequency “spectrum” can be an issue

Share knowledge experiences to manage this challenge

Engage with more telecommunication operators

Academic surveying institutions not providing relevant or quality courses

Impedes sustainability of infrastructure and operations

Engage with relevant institutions

Consider partnerships / programs with academic institutions

More collaboration amongst academic agencies

Decision makers not understanding the importance / value of geospatial / geodetic infrastructure

This also applies to the “society” understanding our value.

Lack of political will and suitable “champions” to advocate the value of geospatial / geodetic infrastructure

Promote the social, economic benefits / importance (disaster / saving lives) at the national / regional level

Articulating the cause and the effect scenarios

“Top down and bottom up” approach.

Try to get interest / involvement at the Ministerial level – think like them?

Innovate ways to get their attention - do not focus just on the technical but alternative social / economic “drivers”

Information and awareness campaigns at all levels of government / public / society and make it LOUD.

Attracting more young professionals to surveying

Succession planning

Sustaining the integrity of the infrastructure.

Have a “geodetic” open day!

AtAttend careers workshops.

The forum concluded with participants recognising that each country in the region is at different phases of development with respect to Geospatial and GNSS CORS infrastructure and systems.  It was also acknowledged that despite this the challenges being experienced or resolved by a country are not new or unfamiliar, and that a common and collaborative strategy to overcome these was to share knowledge, information and experiences.   As a consequence, FIG AP CDN and UN-GGIM-AP WG1 agreed to facilitate meetings, workshops or forums in 2017 to confront priority challenges and to continue building the capacity of geospatial scientists and surveyors in the region.  Presently, the UN-GGIM-AP WG1 work plan for 2017 will comprise of workshops in–

Please note, the FIG AP CDN will also endeavour to be involved in the above capacity building activities, and in conjunction with the UN-GGIM-AP WG 1, continue to provide technical support to the Pacific Geospatial and Surveying Council (PGSC).

In addition, a resolution based on the activities of the subject forum was compiled by FIG AP CDN and UN-GGIM-AP WG1.  This resolution was then tabled at the Fifth Plenary Meeting of the Regional Committee UN-GGIM-AP, and was unanimously accepted and endorsed by the members.
The Geodetic Reference Frame resolution was as follows -

The Meeting,
Reaffirming that the Global Geodetic Reference Frame underpins satellite positioning technology, provides the framework for all geospatial activity and is a key enabler of spatial data interoperability, disaster risk reduction, land management, and supports sustainable development,

Recognizing the General Assembly Resolution (A/RES/69/266) on the Global Geodetic Reference Frame for Sustainable Development,

Recognizing also the importance of data sharing to enable global and regional products and services to be related to individual countries to support decision makers to address social and environmental issues such as rapid urbanisation, sustainable development, disaster management, and complex crustal dynamics,

Noting the challenges of building technical capacity in the Asia Pacific region to modernise national geospatial and geodetic infrastructure, in particular GNSS CORS densification, geodetic datum determination, unification of height systems, and integration and interoperability of fundamental datasets,

Noting further the challenges of sustaining geospatial and geodetic infrastructure with respect to accessing reliable communications, obtaining and justifying resources, and modernising relevant legislation, policies, and practices particularly in the context of the administering geospatial and geodetic data,

Noting further the lack of awareness of the value and importance of geospatial and geodetic infrastructure amongst some sectors of government, industry and the wider community,  

Noting further the present limited availability of qualified young geodetic surveyors in the region,

Recommends that the Regional Committee of United Nations Global Geospatial Information Management for Asia and the Pacific (UN-GGIM-AP):

  1. Support geodetic experts to attend appropriate regional forums, such as the UN-GGIM-AP Working Group 1 meetings;
  2. Engage in multilateral collaboration to facilitate the exchange of information, knowledge and experiences so as to address the geospatial and geodetic infrastructure and system challenges;
  3. Adopt the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) by participating in regional geodetic programmes such as the Asia-Pacific Regional Reference Frame (APREF) and the Asia Pacific Regional Geodetic Project (APRGP);
  4. Share geospatial and geodetic data openly and freely to support for example the connection of national datums to global systems so that decision makers can address global and regional issues such as sea level change through the use of global and regional products and services;
  5. Consider sharing real-time geodetic observations to support disaster risk reduction including tsunami warning;
  6. Proactively participate in communication and outreach activities to raise the profile of geodesy as a service to society;
  7. Engage with the relevant academic community to review and implement appropriate courses of study or curriculum to be aligned with the modern requirements for operational geodetic or geospatial scientists;
  8. Advocate promote and communicate the value and importance of geospatial and geodetic infrastructure and information to decision makers, governments, industry, and wider community;
  9. Provide opportunities to develop technical knowledge through internships and short term attachment programs for geodetic and geospatial scientists;
  10. Evaluate and modernise legal and institutional arrangements pertaining to administering geospatial and geodetic data and infrastructure;
  11. Encourage and facilitate technical capability development through training, workshops, and cooperation in GNSS CORS densification, GNSS data processing, geodetic datum and geoid determination, geodetic datum transformations, geospatial data integration and interoperability, and the use of open geodetic software and the sharing of best practice examples and use cases;
  12. Work closely with the International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), in particular the FIG Asia Pacific Capacity Development Network (AP-CDN), the Pacific Geospatial and Surveying Council (PGSC), the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) and other relevant organisations to develop geodetic capability in the Asia Pacific.

 

FIG Asia Pacific Capacity Development Network Report on

 

Upon completion of the Geospatial and GNSS CORS Infrastructure and Systems forum, the 5th UN GGIM AP Plenary Meeting, and the forum on Policy and Legal Frameworks for Geospatial Information Management were convened at the same venue, the Park Royal, Kuala Lumpur.  In addition, two other events ran in parallel and they were the Social Tenure Domain Model (STDM) and Fit-For-Purpose workshop, and the 4th Divisional Meeting of the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN) - Asia South East (ASE).  Altogether, these events over the period 17 – 20 October attracted 495 delegates from 29 countries and consisted of 125 international attendees.  

To view the proceedings please refer to the web location and select the appropriate presentation materials - http://ggim.un.org/Kuala%20Lumpur%20Forum.html

Like most UN-GGIM-AP events opportunity was provided to participants to discuss and question the presentations and their findings.  As a result a “declaration” relating to policy and legal frameworks for geospatial information, and several “resolutions” from UN GGIM AP working groups were subsequently prepared, tabled and endorsed at the UN GGIM AP Plenary Meeting.   Please refer to the following web location http://ggim.un.org/Kuala%20Lumpur%20Forum.html  for the link to the Kuala Lumpur Declaration and to web location http://www.un-ggim-ap.org/  for the various UN-GGIM-AP Working Group Resolutions.

The key messages to note from the UN-GGIM-AP Plenary and Policy and Legal Frameworks forum sessions were–

Once again, special thanks to JUPEM (Department of Survey and Mapping, Malaysia) for sponsoring the UN-GGIM-AP events and also being great hosts for the entire week in Kuala Lumpur.

In concluding, with the rapid advent of urbanisation, the uptake of disruptive technologies and the apparent increased frequency of natural disasters in the Asia Pacific region, FIGs role in developing the geospatial capacity to address these challenges will be important.  Although, it was evident that there is an appetite and willingness amongst individuals and agencies to make an immediate impact, it was generally agreed that more work is still required to obtain the “political will” from the decision makers so as to achieve more affirmative action.

Rob Sarib, Chair of Asia/Pacific FIG Capacity Development Network
25 October 2016

 


©2017 FIG