![]() |
FIG-Commission 7 |
|
Follow-Up
Questionnaire on Cadastre 2014,
August 2000 |
|
Jurisdiction for which the Responses are valid:Country, Province, State
|
|
1. Issues and Activities Related to "Cadastre 2014"1a) Was there some sort of acknowledgment of the 6 statements by professional
associations and/or authorities in your country/state ? 1b) Was "Cadastre 2014" translated in your national language ? If yes,
please give some details (sponsor, available through, published by). Has
the translation been distributed among the professionals and in what context
? Is it available on the Internet (if yes, what is the address ?) 1c) Has "Cadastre 2014" been presented in your country/state, and were
there panel discussions or similar events ? 1d) Have working groups been set up in your country/state to further
investigate "Cadastre 2014" issues in your national context ? 1e) Is "Cadastre 2014" known and been acknowledged outside the surveying
profession ? If yes, in which ones ?
|
|
2. Status of the 6 StatementsPlease, comment the 6 statements from your country/state point of view, what the status of the statement is, how you rate its value, and any relevant critics or observations to it. |
|
Statement 1):Cadastre 2014 will show the complete legal situation of land, including public rights and restrictions! |
![]() |
|
2a) Are public rights and restrictions already included in your cadastre,
or will they be in the near future ? What is your comment relative to
statement 1) from your country/state point of view ? |
|
Cadastre 2014 documenting "Private Law" and "Public Law" |
![]() |
|
2b) Does your cadastral system document both rights from "private law"
as well as restrictions from "public law" ? |
|
Concept of land objects: |
|
|
2c) Is the concept of land objects adopted in the set-up of your cadastral
system ? If yes, how ? |
|
Principle of legal independence |
|
|
2d) Is the principle of legal independence adopted in your cadastral
set-up ? If yes, how ? |
|
Statement 2):The separation between 'maps' and 'registers' will be abolished! |
|
|
2e) Are the organizations of 'maps' and 'registers' still separated or
are they integrated ? What is your comment relative to statement 2) from
your country/state point of view ? |
|
Statement 3):'Cadastral mapping' will be dead! Long lives modeling! |
|
|
2f) Does data modeling play a role in your national Cadastre ? In what
respect ? What is your comment relative to statement 3) from your country/state
point of view ? |
|
Statement 4):'Paper and pencil cadastre' will be gone! |
|
|
2g) Do 'paper and pencil' still play a role in your cadastre ? What is
your comment relative to statement 4) ? |
|
Statement 5):Cadastre 2014 will be highly privatized! Public and private sector are working closely together! |
|
|
2h) Is there a private sector in your country/state doing work for the
cadastral system ? Are public and private sectors working together ? What
is your comment to statement 5) from your point of view ? |
|
Statement 6):Cadastre 2014 will be cost recovering! |
|
|
2i) Is your cadastre cost recovering now ? Will it be to a certain extend
in the future ? What is your comment to statement 6) ? |
|
3. Developments beyond "Cadastre 2014" |
|
|
3a) In your country, do you see other important developments that go
beyond "Cadastre 2014" ? Do the statements of "Cadastre 2014" lack of
certain other developments or would there be other visions in the field
of cadastre ? Does "Cadastre 2014" have obvious weaknesses ? |
|
|
3b) Do you have any other observations concerning "Cadastre 2014" ? |
|
Thank you for your time ! |
|